Law in Contemporary Society

View   r7  >  r6  ...
VeblenWantsTalk 7 - 13 Mar 2008 - Main.StephenClarke
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"
Veblen argues, referring to man's affection for a tidy and well kept house, that "the effects are pleasing to us chiefly because we have been taught to find them pleasing." (p.51)
Line: 36 to 36
 

-- StephenClarke - 12 Mar 2008

Added:
>
>

Veblen directly addresses the basic test for what is and is not conspicuous consumption in chapter 4 when he discusses waste. Veblen writes, “The test to which all expenditure must be brought” is “whether it serves directly to enhance human life on the whole” or “whether it furthers the life process taken impersonally.” He clarifies the meaning of this test later when he writes that the test not whether a given expenditure promotes peace of mind, but whether it results in a “net gain in comfort or fullness of life.” Every expenditure is waste if it is the result of a custom “traceable to the habit of making an invidious pecuniary comparison.”

-- StephenClarke - 13 Mar 2008

 
 
<--/commentPlugin-->

Revision 7r7 - 13 Mar 2008 - 16:10:33 - StephenClarke
Revision 6r6 - 12 Mar 2008 - 23:12:29 - StephenClarke
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM