| | |
|
StudentPerceptionsOfTheCurve 3 - 31 Mar 2009 - Main.MolissaFarber
|
| | A statement several people made today was that the notion of the grading curve was insulting. They based this (I assume) on the fact that their grades were measured relative to the overall performance of the class, as opposed to an individualized assessment of the quality of the work done. It seems to me, though, that this mistakes the purpose and significance of grades. Grades are not necessarily an evaluation of the specific person's work done, or the effort they put in; this is especially true when the grading format is an anonymous exam.
Instead, the purpose of curving grades is to define relative achievement within the class. Whether or not this is best represented by a single test is another question, but it seems to me that grades are not merely a tool to pat people on the back for a job well done. I remember in college that the most popular classes were those taught by professors who were notorious for easy grading. If everyone gets a good grade though, what does that actually say? A B+ in a class where the average grade is an A should be a lot less meaningful than a B in a class where the average is a C+. The curve eliminates this problem. | | | Is our fear of the grading curve, then, just re-directed fear of each other?
-- ScottThurman - 31 Mar 2009 | |
>
> |
Scott, I don't understand the "artificial scarcity" aspect of grades. I read your paper and I understand that that you referenced this there as well when you referred to the scarcity of certain GPAs as empty and mythological. Still, how are good grades, which is the sort of grades I assume meant to refer to as scarce, artificially scarce? If anything, the curve makes them actually, quantifiably scarce. I can understand arguing that the grades that result from the curve might be artificial because they don't measure the right qualities, or perhaps you mean that the grades are artificial in the sense that they are "man-made" by professors defining the curve.
This could be a semantics point, but since you reference it in your paper it seems possible that you may further develop the concept. In that instance, can I suggest finding a different way to phrase the idea than "the artificial scarcity of grades"? I read that and immediately shut off to your argument, because as far as I can see, there is nothing artificial about the scarcity of top grades.
-- MolissaFarber - 31 Mar 2009 |
|
|
|
|
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
|
|
| | |