A statement several people made today was that the notion of the grading curve was insulting. They based this (I assume) on the fact that their grades were measured relative to the overall performance of the class, as opposed to an individualized assessment of the quality of the work done. It seems to me, though, that this mistakes the purpose and significance of grades. Grades are not necessarily an evaluation of the specific person's work done, or the effort they put in; this is especially true when the grading format is an anonymous exam.

Instead, the purpose of curving grades is to define relative achievement within the class. Whether or not this is best represented by a single test is another question, but it seems to me that grades are not merely a tool to pat people on the back for a job well done. I remember in college that the most popular classes were those taught by professors who were notorious for easy grading. If everyone gets a good grade though, what does that actually say? A B+ in a class where the average grade is an A should be a lot less meaningful than a B in a class where the average is a C+. The curve eliminates this problem.

I think Professor Moglen touched on this by saying The idea of top-ness is generated here. This seems to directly capture a lot of student insecurities and worries, especially with regard to the grading curve. Many students at CLS are used to getting very high grades, and have come to define their results in a course by the grade they receive. This creates the self-imposed stress that people worry about, especially when its coupled with a sense that a low grade is a reflection upon the innate quality of the student overall. The problem is that there are many other factors that should come into play with regard to how one feels about one's effort in a class; these factors were discussed by Professor Moglen, and include things such as improvement, risk taking, etc.

Does the grading system need reform? Probably, and it's something that has been a frequent topic of conversation. But as it stands now, having the curve seems to be necessary in order to make grades relevant. Certainly there should be flexibility with regards to an especially outstanding class, and professors should be allowed to work within it. But I wonder if the fear discussed is not narrative created by students worrying about their own merit?

-- AaronShepard - 31 Mar 2009

Indeed, Aaron. Being one of the students evidently so affected by the grading curve as to write a paper about it, I began to wonder today if the great interest in the grading curve was really a channeling mechanism.

I'm sure that no one likes being at the bottom of any assessment. But the real anxiety about competition for grades would, I think, dissipate significantly if not for the perception that grades meaning something to employers. The artificial scarcity of grades would mean less when not connected to a very real scarcity of employment (especially certain types of employment).

Is our fear of the grading curve, then, just re-directed fear of each other?

-- ScottThurman - 31 Mar 2009