The illusion of choice: how ads shape life decisions

-- By LinaHackenberg - 04 Dec 2024

Introduction

"The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist"(The Usual Suspects (1995)). Today, advertising has achieved something similar. It convinces us that we are in control of our choices, even as it quietly shapes them. Through invisibility and the illusion of choice, advertising exerts profound influence over personal decisions and societal structures. This essay examines how ads manipulate, shape major life decisions, and explores how awareness and resistance can help reclaim autonomy.

Invisibility

Advertising has become invisible, and this invisibility matters because influencing without awareness turns persuasion into manipulation. Ads no longer rely on banners and catchy slogans but integrate seamlessly into familiar formats. This makes their promotional nature almost undetectable. Platforms like BuzzFeed use "the same design, headline format, and imagery people"(https://techcrunch.com/2014/08/12/buzzhome/)for introducing ads, so they "blend in"(https://techcrunch.com/2014/08/12/buzzhome/).This practice, known as native advertising, takes advantage of the trust users place in familiar platforms by disguising promotional content as editorial pieces. It is "designed to deceive us"(https://techcrunch.com/2014/08/12/buzzhome/).

Why shove URLs into the text creating ugliness and distracting the reader when you can make links in the ordinary way. We are writing for the Web after all, so why not use hypertext as designed? See the TextFormattingRules or use the "make a link" button on the wiki editor's toolbar; it is perfectly convenient.

Its subtlety is modern advertising's greatest strength. BuzzFeed itself notes the goal, to "raise the bar for native advertising such that people can`t distinguish between ads and organic content"(https://techcrunch.com/2014/08/12/buzzhome/). Labels like "Sponsored" or "Promoted by" are positioned to go unnoticed, allowing users to consume content without realizing it is promotional. The principle at play is simple: "We cannot see what is before us" (https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45331761.pdf). Accordingly, ads become an invisible part of the digital experience and leave users susceptible to persuasion they cannot consciously recognize.

Illusion of choice

Simultaneously, however, advertising creates the illusion of choice (https://books.google.com/books?id=z3iSEAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=de&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false) by using the language of freedom. Phrases like "tailored for you" or "discover what you love" suggest users are in control. Algorithmic personalization furthers this impression by framing decisions as self-directed. Yet, this sense of autonomy is carefully crafted within boundaries set by advertisers. Consumers are reduced to passive recipients, mere "eyeballs" (https://old.law.columbia.edu/my_pubs/barbecue.html) absorbing messages. The choices they perceive as their own are shaped to serve advertisers goals. Personalization, rather than empowering users, masks a curated and controlled reality.

The illusion of choice is further reinforced by a dynamic resembling Stockholm Syndrome. Users come to choose advertising as a "necessary evil" ( https://thejns.org/view/journals/j-neurosurg/132/2/article-p673.xml) rationalizing its pervasive presence as the price of free access to indispensable platforms. Over time, ads are viewed as neutral or even beneficial, their manipulative nature minimized or ignored.

This mindset, however, is deeply problematic. It encourages acceptance of an exploitative system and discourages users from questioning the trade-offs they make. Escaping this way of thinking requires a fundamental shift in perspective. It requires recognizing that advertising's omnipresence is neither inevitable nor indispensable.

Major life decisions

Advertising exceeds selling products. It shapes how people live their lives and what they prioritize.

Ads for fertility treatments or egg freezing often present delayed parenthood as an empowering choice. While these messages can be helpful for some, they also steer societal norms, suggesting that delaying family life is the most responsible or desirable path. Similarly, ads for online courses or tech bootcamps promote specific career paths as ideal for success in today's economy. By positioning these options as aspirational, they can limit how people view other opportunities and narrow their understanding of what success looks like.

On a broader scale, advertising reinforces existing inequalities through personalization. Wealthier individuals are shown ads for elite services or high-end opportunities, while lower-income users are targeted with lower-quality options. This creates a divide where some groups are presented with expansive possibilities, and others are confined to limited ones. Over time, this dynamic does not just reflect economic disparities. It perpetuates them and further entrenches societal inequalities.

Awareness and resistance

Reclaiming autonomy requires both recognition of advertising's invisibility and a shift in mindset.

Media literacy is an essential first step. Individuals must learn to identify disguised ads, critically evaluate algorithmic personalization, and question the content they consume. Recognizing that ads often blur the line between organic content and promotion is key to fostering skepticism. Users must understand that advertisements are pervasive and deliberately designed to exploit cognitive biases. As a result, questioning why certain products or messages are being shown, and whose interests they serve, is key to regaining control.

Equally important is escaping the Stockholm Syndrome of advertising – the belief that its omnipresence is necessary or a fair trade-off for free access to digital platforms. This mindset encourages users to justify manipulative practices as an inevitable part of modern life and traps them in a cycle of passive acceptance. Yet, breaking this cycle requires a fundamental mindset shift. It requires acknowledging that invisible advertising is a deliberate choice by platforms to maximize profit, not an unavoidable feature of digital spaces. It requires users to "demand more transparency" (https://www.technologyreview.com/2014/02/12/174259/sell-your-personal-data-for-8-a-month/).

Only by critically engaging with the content they consume and rejecting the idea that manipulation is an acceptable cost can users begin to make choices that are truly their own.

Conclusion

To conclude, modern advertising's greatest strength lies in its ability to operate unseen, creating the illusion of choice while quietly shaping behavior. Much like the devil in "The Usual Suspects(1995)", it convinces us it is not there while shaping our decisions and priorities. This invisibility transforms persuasion into manipulation and exploits the trust we place in familiar platforms. By disguising control as freedom, it erodes our autonomy and normalizes its pervasive influence.

To fight this, we must become better at identifying disguised ads and approach online content with skepticism. We must also reject the notion that invisible advertising is a necessary part of modern life and have the courage to demand greater transparency from digital platforms. Only by unmasking modern advertisement's invisibility, much like exposing the devil's greatest trick, we can reclaim our autonomy and protect our ability to make independent decisions.

Fine so far as it goes, but you don't point out or deal with the consequences of the fact that in a digital information stream, ads are filterable. You don't have to see ads, no one else has to see ads, and the discussion of the effects of advertising should at least take account of that reality. Without adding any technical complexity, you could just begin by installing the Brave browser. The experiment of pointing it at BuzzFeed and seeing what happens to the "native" advertising would no doubt be instructive. A few days of the Web without the ads might test for you some of your other intuitions. Perhaps your reader would want to know that "to fight this" (substantially at least) it suffices to begin by changing to a free software browser not distributed by an advertising company, don't you think?

---

You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable. To restrict access to your paper simply delete the "#" character on the next two lines:

• #Set ALLOWTOPICVIEW = TWikiAdminGroup, LinaHackenberg
• #Set DENYTOPICVIEW = TWikiGuest

Note: TWiki has strict formatting rules for preference declarations. Make sure you preserve the three spaces, asterisk, and extra space at the beginning of these lines. If you wish to give access to any other users simply add them to the comma separated ALLOWTOPICVIEW list.