RickeyOrrSecondEssay 3 - 25 Jan 2025 - Main.RickeyOrr
|
|
META TOPICPARENT | name="SecondEssay" |
| |
< < | A Legal Solution to Lost Media | > > | Law Library Requiem | | | |
< < | -- By RickeyOrr - 06 Dec 2024 | > > | -- By RickeyOrr - 24 Jan 2025 | | | |
< < | Thousands of years from now, after our society is gone, what evidence will be left of our civilization? What will future human beings be able to look at to understand our shared values, entertainment, and what life was like for the average person. Whereas, modern day humans have been able to look back and learn about previous civilizations, the same may not be true for our successors. Due to the rising digitization of media and a lack of physical records, we are living in a digital dark age. It is essential that an amendment to the Copyright Act of 1976 is passed requiring the preservation of all forms of media. This will ensure that our contributions to the planet are documented for future generations and societies to learn from and enjoy. | > > | Damnatio Memoriae | | | |
< < |
What? Any reader educated in any of the relevant disciplines (archaeology, history, anthropology, etc.) is likely to be rather puzzled by the assertion that the human past is well-recorded. Any with knowledge and skills in the relevant current technological disciplines is likely to doubt your "dark ages" assertion too, knowing that overpreservation is as likely as technological obsolescence to affect the future's ability to understand the present. No one who has read the Copyright Act (you have, right?) is likely to think the deposit requirement insufficient, or improvable, given that copyright holders are not likely to be the conserving parties. It may be that you want to offer controversial or counterintuitive arguments. But to start out by giving the reader a "WTF?" impression is not the best way to do so. Shooting your own credibility at the outset doesn't help.
| > > | Throughout time, the winners of wars, conquests, and invasions have rewritten history to paint themselves in a more favorable light. In some instances, these “victors” have gone as far as burning and destroying everything from the civilization they took over. This is known as iconoclasm, or more often today, the whitewashing of history. | | | |
> > | From 500 to 1500 AD, Europe fell into a “Dark Age”. The Dark Ages were a period during which no significant writings, discoveries, or inventions occurred. Thus, human civilization became dormant. | | | |
< < | Background | > > | However, in 711, the Moors, a population from North Africa, invaded the Iberian Peninsula (Modern Day Spain). They ruled this region until 1492. Over the next 700 to 800 years, The Moors developed algebra, the number zero, our modern numeral system, introduced chess and saffron to the region, and established numerous universities. | | | |
< < | Our society is experiencing a digital dark age due to the rapid increase of lost media. Lost media are books, television shows, films, music, and newspaper articles that are no longer accessible to the general public. Popular examples include the ninety-seven missing episodes of the BBC television series Dr. Who and the deleted jitterbug scene from The Wizard of Oz. Lost media prevents the public from referencing prior records of our cultural zeitgeist and the artistic traditions which have influenced our current artistic practices. | > > | In 1492, King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella seeking to reclaim the Iberian Peninsula waged war against The Moors. They not only expelled The Moors from Spain but burned all evidence of their rule through the destruction of their architecture, the burning of their libraries and writings, and the repainting of their portraits. | | | |
< < | A lack of media from our current time can also reshape future generations and civilizations' understanding of the past. For example, if mid-twentieth century alien invasion films were never preserved, then people in the future might think that this genre of film never existed. They would fail to understand how these films were made in reaction to the Great Migration as aliens destroying cities mirrored twentieth century, white Americans' hesitation towards Black Americans moving into their neighborhoods. Media, even if it is entertainment, comments on the world around us and captures the cultural attitudes, beliefs, and zeitgeist of the time. This is why the increase in lost media and the decrease of physical media should be a problem for everyone. | > > | This process of erasure is known as damnatio memoriae or condemnation of memory for religious, power, or political reasons. It occurred during the Roman Empire, the 800s, the Reformation, and the French Revolution. In each of these periods, there was a deliberate and well-executed censoring of the memory of disagreeable predecessors or those who came before. | | | |
< < |
What? Of the 162 treatises on constitutions Aristotle produced, two survived. There are missing episodes of Doctor Who? So what? The Twelve Tables? Any writings concerning Yehoshua of Nazareth written less than 100 years after his death? All the written works of Mayan societies destroyed deliberately by the Catholic Church? The possible loss of "alien invasion movies"? Any literate reader is likely to suppose you are pulling their leg.
| > > | Columbia Law School's Library | | | |
< < | The Problems Lost Media Creates | > > | On October 18, 2022, the former dean of Columbia Law School, Gillian Lester, announced to law students over email that Columbia Law School’s Alia Tutor Law Library had received a gift of $17.5 million dollars from alum Alia Tutor. Beginning May 2024, Columbia law students no longer had access to their library. Whereas, Columbia law students normally do not have access to Jerome Greene Hall during the summer, the lack of access to the library continued into the 2024-2025 school year. This proved to be a nuisance to many law students as there was now less study space in Jerome Greene Hall and access to books and other resources were limited. | | | |
< < | Unintentional destruction and changing habits has contributed to the rise in lost media. Fires at film studios have caused numerous films to become lost. Fox Film Corporation’s library caught on fire in 1937 and one of MGM’s vaults caught on fire in 1965. According to the Library of Congress, fifty percent of films created before 1950 have been lost. Without these films, there is less evidence and perspectives of what life was like in the first half of the twentieth century. It also deprives future artists of learning from their predecessors and creating new works inspired by them. | > > | According to architecture and design firm Perkins Eastman, they were hired by the university to renovate the reading areas and book stacks. Additionally, the firm will also create new private rooms and rooms for seminar classes within the law library. However, when looking at the firm’s digital markups, all one sees is long empty tables and bookshelves that are only three shelves high. | | | |
< < | The intentional destruction of media should be challenged through law. The deletion of television shows and films from streaming services intentionally deprives the public from accessing media. Additionally, the lack of physical media due to the decline of book, DVD and CD sales exacerbates this problem. In 2023, Warner Bros. deleted the films Batgirl and Coyote v. Acme. Similarly, AMC deleted the television show Invitation to the Bonfire. Streaming services delete media from their platforms so they can avoid spending money on marketing, avoid paying union-mandated residuals to talent, and can utilize the project as a tax write-off. | > > | Before the renovations occurred, the law library had numerous book stacks that felt endless. My question for Perkins Eastman is “Where are all these pre-existing books going?” Where do they fit with the “reimagined” law library? Moreover, Columbia Law School already has classrooms across numerous buildings. Is it necessary to erase space for books to create more classrooms? | | | |
< < | The digitalization of all media raises the question of who controls the preservation and exploitation of media. Oftentimes, the talent that created this media is the most affected. When a streaming service deletes a film or television show from their platform, actors and crew members who worked on the project cannot use the footage in their reels. This creates a pipeline problem in the entertainment industry as these artists do not have evidence of their previous work. It also prevents the original screenwriter from moving the project to another platform as potential buyers cannot watch the original. Similarly, the lack of access prevents future artists from becoming inspired to create their own art based on the deleted project. This violates the purpose of the intellectual property clause in the Constitution as deletion prevents the art form from progression as it should. | > > | It also takes recognizing whether a renovation this huge is fair to the current law students who are paying tuition. Personally, not having the law library for a whole academic year is a huge let down. It is harder to find a place to study and now when someone wants to read a book, they must request that book through the school.In the past, a law student could go to the shelf themselves and pick it up. This adds a surveillance aspect into the law school and into what law students chose to read. | | | |
< < | My Solution | > > | In the past, when a student wanted a book, as long as they knew where it was, ideally no one would know what books they were reading. However, now that Columbia law students no longer have access to their law library, they must request books for pickup. Therefore, the school can now see what books students are reading and can also keep track of who requests which books. The freedom of choice in choosing what to read no longer belongs to students. This also creates problems for law students who choose to read books that the law school does not agree with. Once a law student puts their request in, the school has the ability to make a note and even flag their uni or ID number if they happen to request a book that goes against the university’s wishes or agenda. | | | |
< < | An amendment to the Copyright Act of 1976 is needed to prevent more media from being lost forever. This amendment would require streaming services to release all completed films and television shows that are scrapped or deleted from their platforms to the public domain. The amendment would also create a legal remedy for loss of access to an item of media. As the copyright owner of the media they produce, distributors, studios, networks, publishers, and manufactures would be liable for destroyed media and forced to create effective preservation techniques to prevent losses. This will prevent future media from becoming lost and slow down the push towards creating digital versions of media instead of physical ones. | > > | On Perkins Eastman website, they have examples of twenty previous libraries they have worked on and renovated. The digital markups from many of these projects, however, feature very little books. The dictionary, Merriam-Webster, defines a library as “a place in which literary, musical, artistic, or reference materials (such as books, manuscripts, recordings, or films) are kept for use but not for sale”. If you create a space that is lacking in physical books and reference materials, then what you are creating is not a library. As Professor Moglen said in his “Law in the Internet Society” class, what law students are actually receiving is “An Instagram backdrop in a first class lounge in a second choice airport in a third rate city”. | | | |
< < | Furthermore, the amendment would create an agency that keeps track of all media that has been lost. This would answer questions such as “Which media gets to be considered lost?” and “Who decides what is preserved?”. If there are disparities in the preservation of different types of media or media made by certain affinity groups, special attention will be given to them to rectify and prevent future disparities from occurring. This will ensure that as much media as possible from all perspectives is preserved, creating a complete and thorough picture of what life was like in our society. | > > | The Erasure of the Law Library | | | |
< < | While the push towards digital media has furthered access and lowered the cost of acquiring media, it has led to a decrease in physical copies making it easier for an entire piece of media to be erased. Therefore, it is essential that an amendment to the Copyright Act of 1976 requiring all media deleted or scrapped from a platform be immediately released into the public domain. This will ensure that evidence of our lives, our society, and our beliefs remain, but more importantly future civilizations know that we were here. | > > | Currently Columbia law students do not have a law library to access or call their own. What came before was a law library with endless stacks of books, available for law students to use at numerous hours of the day. According to the artist renderings and the renovation updates, what comes after will be less physical books and more community spaces. | | | |
> > | One must ask themselves, “Why did the people in power of Columbia Law School find it necessary to destroy a usable, good law library and replace it with something paling in comparison?” What was their perceived gain from destroying the current law library? Some of the motivations given on the school's website are to increase study space, add more classrooms, and to increase the number of computer screens. Either way, this decision has left Columbia’s law students without a library for the 2024-2025 academic year and without all the physical books that once held space within that library. | | | |
< < |
The best way to improve this draft is to drop the fascination with popular entertainment and discuss actual issues of historical conservation. That might even cause you to inquire into, e.g., the destruction of libraries, including your own. Why would a person who thought conservation was relevant use streaming services in the first place? When I die, all my books, all my music library, all the films I collected, etc. over the course of my lifetime will be given to all the people I care about in a form they can use and pass on, forever. If you think it matters, why aren't you doing the same? If you are, why don't you explain to the reader how?
| |
|
|
RickeyOrrSecondEssay 2 - 11 Jan 2025 - Main.EbenMoglen
|
|
META TOPICPARENT | name="SecondEssay" |
A Legal Solution to Lost Media | | Thousands of years from now, after our society is gone, what evidence will be left of our civilization? What will future human beings be able to look at to understand our shared values, entertainment, and what life was like for the average person. Whereas, modern day humans have been able to look back and learn about previous civilizations, the same may not be true for our successors. Due to the rising digitization of media and a lack of physical records, we are living in a digital dark age. It is essential that an amendment to the Copyright Act of 1976 is passed requiring the preservation of all forms of media. This will ensure that our contributions to the planet are documented for future generations and societies to learn from and enjoy. | |
< < | Background | > > |
What? Any reader educated in any of the relevant disciplines (archaeology, history, anthropology, etc.) is likely to be rather puzzled by the assertion that the human past is well-recorded. Any with knowledge and skills in the relevant current technological disciplines is likely to doubt your "dark ages" assertion too, knowing that overpreservation is as likely as technological obsolescence to affect the future's ability to understand the present. No one who has read the Copyright Act (you have, right?) is likely to think the deposit requirement insufficient, or improvable, given that copyright holders are not likely to be the conserving parties. It may be that you want to offer controversial or counterintuitive arguments. But to start out by giving the reader a "WTF?" impression is not the best way to do so. Shooting your own credibility at the outset doesn't help.
Background | | Our society is experiencing a digital dark age due to the rapid increase of lost media. Lost media are books, television shows, films, music, and newspaper articles that are no longer accessible to the general public. Popular examples include the ninety-seven missing episodes of the BBC television series Dr. Who and the deleted jitterbug scene from The Wizard of Oz. Lost media prevents the public from referencing prior records of our cultural zeitgeist and the artistic traditions which have influenced our current artistic practices.
A lack of media from our current time can also reshape future generations and civilizations' understanding of the past. For example, if mid-twentieth century alien invasion films were never preserved, then people in the future might think that this genre of film never existed. They would fail to understand how these films were made in reaction to the Great Migration as aliens destroying cities mirrored twentieth century, white Americans' hesitation towards Black Americans moving into their neighborhoods. Media, even if it is entertainment, comments on the world around us and captures the cultural attitudes, beliefs, and zeitgeist of the time. This is why the increase in lost media and the decrease of physical media should be a problem for everyone. | |
< < | The Problems Lost Media Creates | > > |
What? Of the 162 treatises on constitutions Aristotle produced, two survived. There are missing episodes of Doctor Who? So what? The Twelve Tables? Any writings concerning Yehoshua of Nazareth written less than 100 years after his death? All the written works of Mayan societies destroyed deliberately by the Catholic Church? The possible loss of "alien invasion movies"? Any literate reader is likely to suppose you are pulling their leg.
The Problems Lost Media Creates | | Unintentional destruction and changing habits has contributed to the rise in lost media. Fires at film studios have caused numerous films to become lost. Fox Film Corporation’s library caught on fire in 1937 and one of MGM’s vaults caught on fire in 1965. According to the Library of Congress, fifty percent of films created before 1950 have been lost. Without these films, there is less evidence and perspectives of what life was like in the first half of the twentieth century. It also deprives future artists of learning from their predecessors and creating new works inspired by them. | | While the push towards digital media has furthered access and lowered the cost of acquiring media, it has led to a decrease in physical copies making it easier for an entire piece of media to be erased. Therefore, it is essential that an amendment to the Copyright Act of 1976 requiring all media deleted or scrapped from a platform be immediately released into the public domain. This will ensure that evidence of our lives, our society, and our beliefs remain, but more importantly future civilizations know that we were here. | |
> > |
The best way to improve this draft is to drop the fascination with popular entertainment and discuss actual issues of historical conservation. That might even cause you to inquire into, e.g., the destruction of libraries, including your own. Why would a person who thought conservation was relevant use streaming services in the first place? When I die, all my books, all my music library, all the films I collected, etc. over the course of my lifetime will be given to all the people I care about in a form they can use and pass on, forever. If you think it matters, why aren't you doing the same? If you are, why don't you explain to the reader how?
| |
You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable. |
|
RickeyOrrSecondEssay 1 - 06 Dec 2024 - Main.RickeyOrr
|
|
> > |
META TOPICPARENT | name="SecondEssay" |
A Legal Solution to Lost Media
-- By RickeyOrr - 06 Dec 2024
Thousands of years from now, after our society is gone, what evidence will be left of our civilization? What will future human beings be able to look at to understand our shared values, entertainment, and what life was like for the average person. Whereas, modern day humans have been able to look back and learn about previous civilizations, the same may not be true for our successors. Due to the rising digitization of media and a lack of physical records, we are living in a digital dark age. It is essential that an amendment to the Copyright Act of 1976 is passed requiring the preservation of all forms of media. This will ensure that our contributions to the planet are documented for future generations and societies to learn from and enjoy.
Background
Our society is experiencing a digital dark age due to the rapid increase of lost media. Lost media are books, television shows, films, music, and newspaper articles that are no longer accessible to the general public. Popular examples include the ninety-seven missing episodes of the BBC television series Dr. Who and the deleted jitterbug scene from The Wizard of Oz. Lost media prevents the public from referencing prior records of our cultural zeitgeist and the artistic traditions which have influenced our current artistic practices.
A lack of media from our current time can also reshape future generations and civilizations' understanding of the past. For example, if mid-twentieth century alien invasion films were never preserved, then people in the future might think that this genre of film never existed. They would fail to understand how these films were made in reaction to the Great Migration as aliens destroying cities mirrored twentieth century, white Americans' hesitation towards Black Americans moving into their neighborhoods. Media, even if it is entertainment, comments on the world around us and captures the cultural attitudes, beliefs, and zeitgeist of the time. This is why the increase in lost media and the decrease of physical media should be a problem for everyone.
The Problems Lost Media Creates
Unintentional destruction and changing habits has contributed to the rise in lost media. Fires at film studios have caused numerous films to become lost. Fox Film Corporation’s library caught on fire in 1937 and one of MGM’s vaults caught on fire in 1965. According to the Library of Congress, fifty percent of films created before 1950 have been lost. Without these films, there is less evidence and perspectives of what life was like in the first half of the twentieth century. It also deprives future artists of learning from their predecessors and creating new works inspired by them.
The intentional destruction of media should be challenged through law. The deletion of television shows and films from streaming services intentionally deprives the public from accessing media. Additionally, the lack of physical media due to the decline of book, DVD and CD sales exacerbates this problem. In 2023, Warner Bros. deleted the films Batgirl and Coyote v. Acme. Similarly, AMC deleted the television show Invitation to the Bonfire. Streaming services delete media from their platforms so they can avoid spending money on marketing, avoid paying union-mandated residuals to talent, and can utilize the project as a tax write-off.
The digitalization of all media raises the question of who controls the preservation and exploitation of media. Oftentimes, the talent that created this media is the most affected. When a streaming service deletes a film or television show from their platform, actors and crew members who worked on the project cannot use the footage in their reels. This creates a pipeline problem in the entertainment industry as these artists do not have evidence of their previous work. It also prevents the original screenwriter from moving the project to another platform as potential buyers cannot watch the original. Similarly, the lack of access prevents future artists from becoming inspired to create their own art based on the deleted project. This violates the purpose of the intellectual property clause in the Constitution as deletion prevents the art form from progression as it should.
My Solution
An amendment to the Copyright Act of 1976 is needed to prevent more media from being lost forever. This amendment would require streaming services to release all completed films and television shows that are scrapped or deleted from their platforms to the public domain. The amendment would also create a legal remedy for loss of access to an item of media. As the copyright owner of the media they produce, distributors, studios, networks, publishers, and manufactures would be liable for destroyed media and forced to create effective preservation techniques to prevent losses. This will prevent future media from becoming lost and slow down the push towards creating digital versions of media instead of physical ones.
Furthermore, the amendment would create an agency that keeps track of all media that has been lost. This would answer questions such as “Which media gets to be considered lost?” and “Who decides what is preserved?”. If there are disparities in the preservation of different types of media or media made by certain affinity groups, special attention will be given to them to rectify and prevent future disparities from occurring. This will ensure that as much media as possible from all perspectives is preserved, creating a complete and thorough picture of what life was like in our society.
While the push towards digital media has furthered access and lowered the cost of acquiring media, it has led to a decrease in physical copies making it easier for an entire piece of media to be erased. Therefore, it is essential that an amendment to the Copyright Act of 1976 requiring all media deleted or scrapped from a platform be immediately released into the public domain. This will ensure that evidence of our lives, our society, and our beliefs remain, but more importantly future civilizations know that we were here.
You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable.
To restrict access to your paper simply delete the "#" character on the next two lines:
Note: TWiki has strict formatting rules for preference declarations. Make sure you preserve the three spaces, asterisk, and extra space at the beginning of these lines. If you wish to give access to any other users simply add them to the comma separated ALLOWTOPICVIEW list. |
|
|
|
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors. All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
|
|