Law in Contemporary Society

View   r7  >  r6  ...
StudentPerceptionsOfTheCurve 7 - 07 Jan 2010 - Main.IanSullivan
Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="OldDiscussionMaterials"
 A statement several people made today was that the notion of the grading curve was insulting. They based this (I assume) on the fact that their grades were measured relative to the overall performance of the class, as opposed to an individualized assessment of the quality of the work done. It seems to me, though, that this mistakes the purpose and significance of grades. Grades are not necessarily an evaluation of the specific person's work done, or the effort they put in; this is especially true when the grading format is an anonymous exam.

Instead, the purpose of curving grades is to define relative achievement within the class. Whether or not this is best represented by a single test is another question, but it seems to me that grades are not merely a tool to pat people on the back for a job well done. I remember in college that the most popular classes were those taught by professors who were notorious for easy grading. If everyone gets a good grade though, what does that actually say? A B+ in a class where the average grade is an A should be a lot less meaningful than a B in a class where the average is a C+. The curve eliminates this problem.


Revision 7r7 - 07 Jan 2010 - 23:00:49 - IanSullivan
Revision 6r6 - 31 Mar 2009 - 23:52:13 - AaronShepard
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM