Law in Contemporary Society

View   r3  >  r2  >  r1
SpitzerAndConspicuousConsumption 3 - 22 Jan 2009 - Main.IanSullivan
Line: 1 to 1
Changed:
<
<
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="OldDiscussionMaterials"
 Today in class we talked about what Spitzer was really getting for $4300 - obviously there was more to it than the nominal purpose. Why, as Moglen pointed out, would he use a method of obtaining a sex partner in which he could easily be caught? Why pay for sex at all? Veblen talks about women as chattels and the use of conspicuous consumption by the leisure class to distinguish itself. It's interesting that this particular behaviour seems to be officially condemned but tacitly approved of, or at least revelled in, by society. Do we really think Spitzer wanted to be found out on some level? I'd like to hear people's thoughts on this.

-- ClaireOSullivan - 13 Mar 2008


SpitzerAndConspicuousConsumption 2 - 16 Mar 2008 - Main.CarinaWallance
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"
Today in class we talked about what Spitzer was really getting for $4300 - obviously there was more to it than the nominal purpose. Why, as Moglen pointed out, would he use a method of obtaining a sex partner in which he could easily be caught? Why pay for sex at all? Veblen talks about women as chattels and the use of conspicuous consumption by the leisure class to distinguish itself. It's interesting that this particular behaviour seems to be officially condemned but tacitly approved of, or at least revelled in, by society. Do we really think Spitzer wanted to be found out on some level? I'd like to hear people's thoughts on this.

-- ClaireOSullivan - 13 Mar 2008

Added:
>
>

Claire, a NYTimes op-ed piece addresses this question quite well and relates to the lesson concerning friends that Eben emphasized. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/14/opinion/14brooks.html?ex=1363233600&en=4c22a43a28efc656&ei=5124&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink

-- CarinaWallance - 16 Mar 2008

 
 
<--/commentPlugin-->

SpitzerAndConspicuousConsumption 1 - 13 Mar 2008 - Main.ClaireOSullivan
Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"
Today in class we talked about what Spitzer was really getting for $4300 - obviously there was more to it than the nominal purpose. Why, as Moglen pointed out, would he use a method of obtaining a sex partner in which he could easily be caught? Why pay for sex at all? Veblen talks about women as chattels and the use of conspicuous consumption by the leisure class to distinguish itself. It's interesting that this particular behaviour seems to be officially condemned but tacitly approved of, or at least revelled in, by society. Do we really think Spitzer wanted to be found out on some level? I'd like to hear people's thoughts on this.

-- ClaireOSullivan - 13 Mar 2008

 
<--/commentPlugin-->

Revision 3r3 - 22 Jan 2009 - 02:14:33 - IanSullivan
Revision 2r2 - 16 Mar 2008 - 23:27:55 - CarinaWallance
Revision 1r1 - 13 Mar 2008 - 20:57:32 - ClaireOSullivan
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM