Law in Contemporary Society

View   r5  >  r4  ...
SociobiologyAndConsilienceTalk 5 - 07 Jan 2010 - Main.IanSullivan
Line: 1 to 1
Changed:
<
<
META TOPICPARENT name="LawContempSoc"
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="OldDiscussionMaterials"
 This topic is about socio-biological arguments and consilient argument structures. Specifically whether the interaction seen between Tharaud and Cerriere in Cerriere's Answer from “Lawyerland” has a biological basis (or whether it matters)

I didn’t fully work out my argument in class until we had moved on, but I still think that the biological conclusion is unnecessary and harmful to the strength of the argument.


Revision 5r5 - 07 Jan 2010 - 23:00:42 - IanSullivan
Revision 4r4 - 22 Jan 2009 - 02:14:30 - IanSullivan
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM