Law in Contemporary Society

View   r3  >  r2  ...
RachelGholstonSecondPaper 3 - 16 Jun 2012 - Main.EbenMoglen
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="SecondPaper"

Poetry

Line: 21 to 21
 

The Conclusion

The only part of my works where the dissonance can’t reach is the poetry. It has always been the poetry. I should be a poet. Or I should be creative in my approach to my work. Personal investment is inherent in creativity or maybe it is the meaning of creativity. Creativity is the production of personal investment in the project. My conclusion is that the anger will keep me from being able to maintain the splitting for a long period of time. I have maintained the splitting for years with little thought to the source of the discomfort that failing to create my own purposes created. That period is over. The conclusion is the awareness I really can't speak to the consequences of that awareness to future events.
Added:
>
>

This is exactly what it needed to be. You have seen what can and can't be seen about your future.

Your poetry will be. So will your practice. They will fit together they way they did for William Carlos Williams, who could not have made this any better.

 (I'm working through the summer)
Added:
>
>

What needs work is the other essay. That could be the analytic exercise my comments on the first draft suggested. Or it should pull itself out of the realm of objectivity. Or it could become something else entirely.

 

Revision 3r3 - 16 Jun 2012 - 22:00:50 - EbenMoglen
Revision 2r2 - 09 Jun 2012 - 08:46:33 - RachelGholston
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM