|
IjahalaPottingerFirstEssay 3 - 15 Apr 2024 - Main.IjahalaPottinger
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="FirstEssay" |
|---|
| |
<
< | Reimagining Legal Education: Embracing Authenticity and Individuality in Law School | >
> | “Law School for One, Please”: Designing a Purpose-Driven Legal Education | | | | |
<
< | -- By IjahalaPottinger - 24 Feb 2024 | >
> | -- By IjahalaPottinger - 15 Apr 2024 | | |
Introduction
For many law students, it is easy to succumb to the conventional narrative – the pursuit of prestigious Big Law careers and rigorous adherence to established norms, expectations, and markers of success. What makes this conformity an attractive choice? Is it the product of intentional reflection and measured decision-making? Is it the path of least resistance? Or is it something else? | |
<
< | What if law school allowed students to explore their passions and interests rather than conforming to predefined scripts of success? How can traditional legal education empower students to become the architects of their careers, limited only by their imagination? In this thought piece, I will explore the disillusionment associated with traditional legal education, the challenges first-year law students face, and the quest for authenticity in the legal profession. | >
> | Given law school’s developmental significance in one’s journey toward becoming a legal practitioner, students must leverage their academic passions and interests to design an intentional legal education that will inform a purpose-driven legal practice rather than conform to predefined scripts of success. This essay seeks to explore the disillusionment associated with traditional legal education, highlight the challenges first-year law students face, and articulate a vision for embracing authenticity and individuality in law school through a personalized program of study. | | | Law School as a Mystification Exercise | |
<
< | Law school is often romanticized as a bastion of academic pursuit and professional advancement. For many students, however, the reality falls short of these lofty expectations. During the three years between my undergraduate graduation and law school enrollment, I yearned to return to the classroom. I was eager to engage in intellectual thought exercises and connect legal theory to policy to uncover how certain power structures came to be and how the law shapes lived experiences. Though that has yet to be my experience, I must remind myself that I am both grateful and privileged to belong to the law school community. I must remember that for anyone, especially those of us who identify as first-generation, pursuing a legal education unlocks opportunities and resources many people can only dream of accessing. On my worst days, this reality is my sole motivating factor. While my experience is not without critique, I must approach my legal education with humility and appreciation for the chance to pursue my passions and aspirations and pave the way for future generations in my family and community to do the same. | >
> | Often romanticized as a bastion of academic pursuit and professional advancement, law school falls short of these lofty expectations for many students in reality. During the three years between my undergraduate graduation and law school matriculation, I yearned to return to the classroom to uncover how legal theory interacts with policy to create and reproduce social power and inequities. Though that has yet to be my experience, I must remind myself that I am both grateful and privileged to belong to the law school community. For anyone, especially those of us who identify as first-generation, pursuing a legal education unlocks opportunities and resources many people can only dream of accessing. On my worst days, this realization is my sole motivating factor. Nevertheless, I must approach my legal education with humility and appreciation for the platform to pursue my aspirations and pave the way for future generations in my family and community to do the same. | | | | |
<
< | Growing up in immigrant communities, I became interested in how race, class, education, and politics interact with the legal system to perpetuate socioeconomic inequities as a child. I attended a pre-law magnet high school where I became passionate about the compounding harm imposed on low-income communities of color due to racial disparities in mass incarceration. Learning about prosecutorial discretion, transformative justice, and prison abolition, I imagined myself pursuing a public service career to mitigate racial injustice in the sentencing of juvenile offenders. Before beginning law school, I understood the journey's rigorous nature. What I did not anticipate, however, was that I would start to forget my reasons for pursuing law school so early in my process. As Duncan Kennedy writes, I am probably disillusioned by traditional legal pedagogy emphasizing unconnected legal problems in the mystified context of legal reasoning in isolation from actual lawyering experience. When my discomfort becomes too burdensome, I search for community online. Before long, I am down a rabbit hole of academic articles discussing how the disconnect between classroom learning and actual legal practice exacerbates feelings of uncertainty and self-doubt among first-year law students. A consensus that the rigid curriculum and competitive environment stifle creativity and breed a profound sense of disillusionment emerges. I find the description for a course entitled, “(Dis)illusionment for Young Lawyers” at Harvard. Is this solace or a warning? | >
> | From a young age, I have been interested in how race, class, education, and politics interact with the legal system to perpetuate socioeconomic inequities. I attended a pre-law magnet high school where I became passionate about the compounding harm imposed on low-income communities of color due to racial disparities in mass incarceration. Learning about institutional racism, prosecutorial discretion, and transformative justice, I imagined myself pursuing a public service career to mitigate racial injustice in the sentencing of juvenile offenders. Before beginning law school, I understood the journey's rigorous nature. However, after 15 years in the making, I was taken aback by how strangely disconnected I felt from my reasons for pursuing a law degree so early in my first year. As Duncan Kennedy writes, I am probably disillusioned by traditional legal pedagogy emphasizing unconnected legal problems in the mystified context of legal reasoning in isolation from actual lawyering experience. When my discomfort becomes too burdensome, I search for community online. Before long, I am down a rabbit hole of academic articles analyzing how the disconnect between classroom learning and legal practice exacerbates feelings of uncertainty and self-doubt among first-year law students. A consensus that the rigid curriculum and competitive environment stifle creativity and breed a profound sense of disillusionment emerges. I find the description for a course entitled, “(Dis)illusionment for Young Lawyers” at Harvard. Is this solace or a warning? | | | The Miseducation of the First-Year Law Student
For many first-year law students, the transition to law school is a daunting experience. Overemphasis on grades, rankings, and prestigious career paths creates a suffocating environment of intense competition and persistent anxiety. Grading reproduces a hierarchy system but gives students little to no feedback on their comprehension or analytical skills. The result is that students experience their grades as mostly arbitrary and unrelated to their expended effort, total understanding of the learned topics, interest in the material, or level of satisfaction with the class and professor. Pursuing traditional academic success in the law school environment does not always align with individual interests or values and fails to communicate much about the student. Compounding this issue is that first-year law students hardly have the time to think critically about what success looks like for them. Yet, the pressure to conform to institutional expectations is immense as students fear what will become of them if they do not fulfill these expectations. The allure of Big Law firms and corporate success is enough to compel students to conform to institutional expectations. It also overshadows alternate areas of interest and career paths that should be considered prestigious. This leaves students trapped in a cycle of conformity and self-doubt – before the golden handcuffs. | |
<
< | A Call for Authenticity, Individuality, and Self-Exploration in Legal Education
Understanding these challenges, law students must reclaim their sense of agency, authenticity, and individuality through self-exploration. Law school does not have to be suitable for everyone, but that does not imply that those grappling with these feelings are not cut out to be lawyers. The task is to uncover one’s self-informed path in the legal profession by resisting the pressures to conform to predefined notions of success. Self-exploration in law school entails introspection, curiosity, and a willingness to explore diverse perspectives and career paths. It involves asking hard questions about one’s values, interests, and goals and seeking opportunities to align one’s academic and professional aspirations with these personal principles.
Conformity – even to impossible standards – is easy. It is predictable and requires little thought. What is challenging is choosing self-discovery. It is uncomfortable and uncertain. Law schools must cultivate inclusive learning environments that empower students to choose this tool to curate their personal and professional development. Reimagining traditional models of legal pedagogy and embracing an individualized approach that prioritizes authenticity, individuality, and self-exploration moves towards that goal.
So does encouraging self-reflection and providing opportunities for experiential learning as early as the first year. Doing so can foster a generation of empowered lawyers equipped to make meaningful societal contributions while resisting some predetermined script.
This is an excellent first draft. It's clear, well-organized, and thoughtful. Its weakness is that it is about something it should be doing, "calling for" something it should deliver instead.
You see clearly how your legal education should be organized, so let's organize it. Not abstractly, by "improving" law school, which is mostly run by fools and will continue to get worse for the foreseeable future, but by making your legal education excellent in the way you see it must be. You are the only person going to your law school, which is located in the midst of what is still a great university, where you can study whatever you want with people who really understand. You have absolute power to ignore any instructions, orders or pressure the point of which you do not agree with or think worthy of your time and attention. Your grades do not matter: if your wits are appropriately sharpened, you will have whatever power, money, status and access in society you wish to have to do whatever it is you want.
On that basis, let's try a draft which lays out as succinctly as possible what you want your future law practice to be about, where and with whom you want to do it. (There two questions define the two moving parts in a law practice: the content of your license, that is what you know how to do; and your network, that is, the people through whom you deliver services to clients and find clients to serve.) From those answers we can begin to devise the program of study (what and with whom to learn while you are here) that best equips you to plan such a practice, and produces the surprises, changes of mind, reframings and reconsiderations, that lifelong professional "higher" education is about. Let us put the attention where it best serves us, on the student and her learning, rather than where it least suits us, on the brokenness and insufficiency that would result from letting the system run on autopilot if we don't do our job.
| >
> | Imagining a Purpose-Driven, Personalized Approach to Legal Education
Understanding these challenges, I must resist the status quo of legal education and seek to reclaim my academic agency by making my legal education excellent in the way I need it to be. Realizing this vision requires examining my values, interests, and goals and aligning my law school experience with these personal principles. I came to law school to learn to apply legal skills to advocate for social equity and protect traditionally underserved individuals’ civil and human rights. I will return to law school this fall to continue this mission. As I envision how this purpose manifests in tangible practice, I intend to focus on areas of law that align with my social justice passions and connect with professors and practitioners who fight systemic injustice, champion marginalized voices, and advance positive social change. | | | | |
>
> | This will be easier said than done, as I often worry about what I “should” do rather than what I want to do. Nevertheless, I must ignore the status quo that tells me to apply to Law Review because it will help land a judicial clerkship or to take Corporations because it’s great for Big Law. I am the only one who will tell me to take Law, Power, and Social Change to explore my interests in the intersection of law, policy, and systemic inequity. It is up to me to sharpen my wits in what collaboration, empathy, and integrity look like in legal practice in Lawyer Leadership and the Mediation Clinic. I have the power to choose Planning Your Practice to continue critically reflecting on what my purpose-driven legal practice looks like. While traditional law school pedagogy may not suit me, I must empower myself to define the content of my license alongside people who will help me uncover exactly what I want my future law practice to be about. | | |
You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable. |
|
|
IjahalaPottingerFirstEssay 2 - 30 Mar 2024 - Main.EbenMoglen
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="FirstEssay" |
|---|
Reimagining Legal Education: Embracing Authenticity and Individuality in Law School | | | Conformity – even to impossible standards – is easy. It is predictable and requires little thought. What is challenging is choosing self-discovery. It is uncomfortable and uncertain. Law schools must cultivate inclusive learning environments that empower students to choose this tool to curate their personal and professional development. Reimagining traditional models of legal pedagogy and embracing an individualized approach that prioritizes authenticity, individuality, and self-exploration moves towards that goal.
So does encouraging self-reflection and providing opportunities for experiential learning as early as the first year. Doing so can foster a generation of empowered lawyers equipped to make meaningful societal contributions while resisting some predetermined script. | |
>
> |
This is an excellent first draft. It's clear, well-organized, and thoughtful. Its weakness is that it is about something it should be doing, "calling for" something it should deliver instead.
You see clearly how your legal education should be organized, so let's organize it. Not abstractly, by "improving" law school, which is mostly run by fools and will continue to get worse for the foreseeable future, but by making your legal education excellent in the way you see it must be. You are the only person going to your law school, which is located in the midst of what is still a great university, where you can study whatever you want with people who really understand. You have absolute power to ignore any instructions, orders or pressure the point of which you do not agree with or think worthy of your time and attention. Your grades do not matter: if your wits are appropriately sharpened, you will have whatever power, money, status and access in society you wish to have to do whatever it is you want.
On that basis, let's try a draft which lays out as succinctly as possible what you want your future law practice to be about, where and with whom you want to do it. (There two questions define the two moving parts in a law practice: the content of your license, that is what you know how to do; and your network, that is, the people through whom you deliver services to clients and find clients to serve.) From those answers we can begin to devise the program of study (what and with whom to learn while you are here) that best equips you to plan such a practice, and produces the surprises, changes of mind, reframings and reconsiderations, that lifelong professional "higher" education is about. Let us put the attention where it best serves us, on the student and her learning, rather than where it least suits us, on the brokenness and insufficiency that would result from letting the system run on autopilot if we don't do our job.
| | |
You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable. |
|
|
IjahalaPottingerFirstEssay 1 - 24 Feb 2024 - Main.IjahalaPottinger
|
|
>
> |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="FirstEssay" |
|---|
Reimagining Legal Education: Embracing Authenticity and Individuality in Law School
-- By IjahalaPottinger - 24 Feb 2024
Introduction
For many law students, it is easy to succumb to the conventional narrative – the pursuit of prestigious Big Law careers and rigorous adherence to established norms, expectations, and markers of success. What makes this conformity an attractive choice? Is it the product of intentional reflection and measured decision-making? Is it the path of least resistance? Or is it something else?
What if law school allowed students to explore their passions and interests rather than conforming to predefined scripts of success? How can traditional legal education empower students to become the architects of their careers, limited only by their imagination? In this thought piece, I will explore the disillusionment associated with traditional legal education, the challenges first-year law students face, and the quest for authenticity in the legal profession.
Law School as a Mystification Exercise
Law school is often romanticized as a bastion of academic pursuit and professional advancement. For many students, however, the reality falls short of these lofty expectations. During the three years between my undergraduate graduation and law school enrollment, I yearned to return to the classroom. I was eager to engage in intellectual thought exercises and connect legal theory to policy to uncover how certain power structures came to be and how the law shapes lived experiences. Though that has yet to be my experience, I must remind myself that I am both grateful and privileged to belong to the law school community. I must remember that for anyone, especially those of us who identify as first-generation, pursuing a legal education unlocks opportunities and resources many people can only dream of accessing. On my worst days, this reality is my sole motivating factor. While my experience is not without critique, I must approach my legal education with humility and appreciation for the chance to pursue my passions and aspirations and pave the way for future generations in my family and community to do the same.
Growing up in immigrant communities, I became interested in how race, class, education, and politics interact with the legal system to perpetuate socioeconomic inequities as a child. I attended a pre-law magnet high school where I became passionate about the compounding harm imposed on low-income communities of color due to racial disparities in mass incarceration. Learning about prosecutorial discretion, transformative justice, and prison abolition, I imagined myself pursuing a public service career to mitigate racial injustice in the sentencing of juvenile offenders. Before beginning law school, I understood the journey's rigorous nature. What I did not anticipate, however, was that I would start to forget my reasons for pursuing law school so early in my process. As Duncan Kennedy writes, I am probably disillusioned by traditional legal pedagogy emphasizing unconnected legal problems in the mystified context of legal reasoning in isolation from actual lawyering experience. When my discomfort becomes too burdensome, I search for community online. Before long, I am down a rabbit hole of academic articles discussing how the disconnect between classroom learning and actual legal practice exacerbates feelings of uncertainty and self-doubt among first-year law students. A consensus that the rigid curriculum and competitive environment stifle creativity and breed a profound sense of disillusionment emerges. I find the description for a course entitled, “(Dis)illusionment for Young Lawyers” at Harvard. Is this solace or a warning?
The Miseducation of the First-Year Law Student
For many first-year law students, the transition to law school is a daunting experience. Overemphasis on grades, rankings, and prestigious career paths creates a suffocating environment of intense competition and persistent anxiety. Grading reproduces a hierarchy system but gives students little to no feedback on their comprehension or analytical skills. The result is that students experience their grades as mostly arbitrary and unrelated to their expended effort, total understanding of the learned topics, interest in the material, or level of satisfaction with the class and professor. Pursuing traditional academic success in the law school environment does not always align with individual interests or values and fails to communicate much about the student. Compounding this issue is that first-year law students hardly have the time to think critically about what success looks like for them. Yet, the pressure to conform to institutional expectations is immense as students fear what will become of them if they do not fulfill these expectations. The allure of Big Law firms and corporate success is enough to compel students to conform to institutional expectations. It also overshadows alternate areas of interest and career paths that should be considered prestigious. This leaves students trapped in a cycle of conformity and self-doubt – before the golden handcuffs.
A Call for Authenticity, Individuality, and Self-Exploration in Legal Education
Understanding these challenges, law students must reclaim their sense of agency, authenticity, and individuality through self-exploration. Law school does not have to be suitable for everyone, but that does not imply that those grappling with these feelings are not cut out to be lawyers. The task is to uncover one’s self-informed path in the legal profession by resisting the pressures to conform to predefined notions of success. Self-exploration in law school entails introspection, curiosity, and a willingness to explore diverse perspectives and career paths. It involves asking hard questions about one’s values, interests, and goals and seeking opportunities to align one’s academic and professional aspirations with these personal principles.
Conformity – even to impossible standards – is easy. It is predictable and requires little thought. What is challenging is choosing self-discovery. It is uncomfortable and uncertain. Law schools must cultivate inclusive learning environments that empower students to choose this tool to curate their personal and professional development. Reimagining traditional models of legal pedagogy and embracing an individualized approach that prioritizes authenticity, individuality, and self-exploration moves towards that goal.
So does encouraging self-reflection and providing opportunities for experiential learning as early as the first year. Doing so can foster a generation of empowered lawyers equipped to make meaningful societal contributions while resisting some predetermined script.
You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable.
To restrict access to your paper simply delete the "#" character on the next two lines:
Note: TWiki has strict formatting rules for preference declarations. Make sure you preserve the three spaces, asterisk, and extra space at the beginning of these lines. If you wish to give access to any other users simply add them to the comma separated ALLOWTOPICVIEW list. |
|
|
|
|
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
|
|