Law in Contemporary Society

View   r8  >  r7  ...
BullshitAndEgomania 8 - 17 Apr 2010 - Main.NonaFarahnik
Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="responsestoclassdiscussion"
 In class, I asked what “freedom” looks like. I am still concerned about the implications of the freedom advertised in this course. Particularly, I am worried that this “freedom” merely replaces one scheme of ego-gratification for another.

If we reject all external sources of meaning as bullshit (and we may have good reason to do so), and refuse to care at all what anyone thinks, then this is freedom, on Professor Moglen’s view. The validity and attractiveness of this position are best addressed elsewhere, but the application and consequences of this view are my concern here. This kind of freedom replaces external means of self-validation for internal means of self-validation; this is potentially problematic. If the source of our values and self worth is exclusively internal, this creates a troubling solipsistic perspective through which one engineers whatever reality is most satisfying to the ego. Which is to say, rejecting the law school/corporate rat-race “bullshit” does not free you from ego needs- it’s just a cleverer way of feeling superior. I think Robinson is a very clear example of how this devolves into egomania-- or, at the very least, insufferable self-aggrandizement.


Revision 8r8 - 17 Apr 2010 - 16:14:16 - NonaFarahnik
Revision 7r7 - 17 Feb 2010 - 10:27:15 - RobLaser
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM